Parenting in the 21st Century
“Start children off on the way they should go, and even when they are old they will not turn from it.”
(Proverbs 22:6)
Dear Students, Parents and Carers
Bringing up children is more difficult than it used to be! I doubt I will receive much disagreement with this proposition. Many of the old mores and authority structures are in decline in a hyper-individualistic society where young people have agency and a megaphone (called social media). They have opinions and a degree of wanderlust.
It is worth noting that adolescence is, in one sense, a creation of modernity. In Industrial England in the 18th century, children as young as five were at work in the mines and later the factories. Even in the later age of universal schooling, most were in paid employment full-time by the age of 14. Some historic accounts indicate young people may have reached puberty at about 18 years of age. Now they grow up (but in many ways don’t quite) very quickly, and appropriate to themselves a level of freedom (from parents) which couldn’t have been imagined in previous centuries. Why do they grow up so quickly? No-one knows. Suggestions include environmental and social factors, including the sexual saturation of much of contemporary society, which sparks hormonal activity early. This is by no means a derogatory commentary on young people. I think they are magnificent! The young people at Shore are particularly fabulous and, in upper grades, they are, in my experience, unusually mature for their age.
How may parents respond in a society that continues to evolve in terms of focal points and trigger issues?
Much commentary, particularly in the realms of psychology and leadership, as well as studies into parenting, tends to arrange parental responses into four quadrants which form a typology of parenting style. Over my long career as a Principal/Headmaster, I have observed the growth of quadrant one, “Permissive Parenting”. This style gives teenagers a great deal of scope. It represents interpersonal warmth but with a low level of demand or boundaries. Sometimes it is characterised by parents wanting to be their child’s friend rather than make unpopular decisions or provide leadership. Such parenting insists their children are always in the right, irrespective of what they may have done. Of course, I am stereotyping for the sake of simplicity. It is important to state that I have seen less of this kind of parenting at Shore than in previous headships. I am glad about that!
Perhaps the most problematic form of parenting can be found in quadrant two, which is “Laissez – Faire Parenting”, where the parents, in effect, cut the child loose and, due to factors such as lack of time or family turbulence, provide neither warmth nor boundaries. The lack of guidance and direction is usually very problematic. Children who endure this style of parenting are, in effect, brought up by the peer group, the media and especially social media. They tend to lack a compass or any form of anchor in their lives and often demonstrate aberrant behaviour.
The third quadrant is that of “Authoritarian Parenting”, which was commonplace some generations ago and still appears in residual form. Authoritarian parenting featured absolute, even tyrannical control with rigid boundaries and enforcement but little emotional warmth. Children who experience this type of parenting can be emotionally stunted. The child remains very dependent, often through fear, until they sever their connection with the home, which they will often do at the first possible opportunity.
The fourth quadrant is that of “Authoritative Parenting”, not to be confused with authoritarian. Authoritative parenting is high in its accountabilities and boundaries for young people but is emotionally warm, such that the parents are present in a deep sense for their children. This provides a framework of security and love where young people are effectively steered in order to enable normal development to adulthood, with a strong sense of ethics and purpose. Authoritative parenting has strong Biblical endorsement: “Start children off on the way they should go, and even when they are old they will not turn from it.” (Proverbs 22:6)
It is not difficult to perceive that authoritative parenting achieves the best outcomes for young people. It provides wonderful stability. It expresses love, not just in emotional terms but in its intent to provide the best leadership for young people, even when decisions may be unpopular in the moment. It is clear that authoritative parenting is, by a large majority, evident in most Shore families. It can survive parental separation where both parties and even new partners maintain the same attitude.
In my 43 years thus far as a member of the Executive across eight schools, I have come to regard suffocating overprotection of children as, in effect, being quite similar to exposure, where children are left to fend for themselves. The former leaves young people unprepared to accept responsibility and navigate the adult world as they have failed to build the necessary skills; hence their arrival into adulthood represents a kind of exposure for them to be buffeted by the world.
You may wonder why I turn my mind to such matters in a Shore Weekly Record article. In fact, I am often asked for advice on parenting. This is not surprising given the substance of a Keynote Address at an Independent Heads of Schools Conference just a few years ago. The presenter was an Academic Psychologist from an Australian university. His key point was that, as people typically leave childbearing until much later than was the case in previous generations, many parents are in their late 40s or 50s before a child reaches their teen years, and unless they have been around young people, they simply don’t remember with any clarity their own childhood and, in the new social order, are uncertain how to proceed.

A second reason for this particular topic is my recent reading of a bestseller (at least in educational circles) co-authored by an American Professor of Psychology, Jonathan Haidt, The Coddling of the American Mind. While his book is mostly about American undergraduates, it appears salient to Australia and to those just a few years younger than his target group. What Haidt describes is an epidemic of adolescent depression and anxiety. Whose fault is this? Haidt, in essence, blames American parents. In terms of this article, he blames them for operating in the
quadrants other than authoritative parenting. He particularly holds them responsible for indulging young people in the use of iPhones or equivalent products without supervision, where they are subjected to the toxic cauldron of social media harassment, which leeches away their self-confidence and sense of identity and worth.
Parenting is difficult. It is perhaps the most difficult time in history to parent an adolescent. Nonetheless, parents at Shore, one hopes in partnership with the School, are producing magnificent young people who enter adulthood with confidence, skill and an ethical framework. This is not an accident and requires purposeful commitment over the decades of childhood and adolescence in one’s children. Although they will often push against the boundaries at the time (and some are what we call “boundary riders”), parents who remain committed and authoritative will usually reap a magnificent harvest of fabulous adults who will be in a splendid, decades-long relationship with their parents through their adult years. All going well, they may even pay for our incarceration in retirement villages in years to come!
Dr John Collier
Headmaster